A bomb is ticking in the Black community.

Each hour, three African-Americans contract HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Black Americans represent 12 percent of the total U.S. population, yet they accounted for 43% of new AIDS cases in 1996, according to a recent survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Aids is the leading killer of African-Americans between the ages of 25 and 44; more Black Americans die from AIDS than from homicide, drugs and alcohol, cancer and heart disease combined!

Chapter from: "AIDS, The End of Civilization", by William Campbell Douglass, M.D. 1989.

The world was startled when the London Times reported on its front page, May 11, 1987, that the World Health Organization (WHO) had "triggered" the AIDS epidemic in Africa through the WHO smallpox immunization program. The only people in the free world not surprised by the London Times front page expose were the Americans--because they never heard about it. It is chilling to think that our press is so controlled that the most momentous news break since the assassination of President Kennedy didn't even make the sports section, much less the front page of any American daily paper, radio or television news.

A careful study of World Health Organization (WHO) literature reveals the careful planning that went into the seeding of AIDS in various nations.

"A systematic evaluation of the effects of viruses on immune functions should be undertaken.... An attempt should be made to ascertain whether viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. . . by affecting T-cell function as opposed to B-cell function. The possibility should also be looked into that the immune response to the virus itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages more or less selectively the cells responding to the viral antigen...."

You don't have to know much virology to see that as a clear call to scientists to attempt to make an immune destroying virus, an acquired immune deficiency--AIDS.

They also laid out a modus operandi for their diabolical scheme:

"In the relation to the immune response a number of useful experimental approaches can be visualized." They suggested that a neat way to do this would be to put their new killer virus (AIDS) into a vaccination program, sit back and observe the results. "This would be particularly informative in sibships," they said. That is, give the AIDS virus to brothers and sisters and see if they die, who dies first, and of what, just like using rats in a laboratory.

They used smallpox vaccine for their vehicle and the geographical sites chosen in 1972 were Uganda and other African states, Haiti and Brazil. The recent past of AIDS epidemiology coincided with these geographical areas.

To understand the enormity of our betrayal you must know about the origin of the AIDS virus. The virologists of the world, the sorcerers who brought us this ghastly plague, have formed a united front in denying that the virus was laboratory-made from known, lethal animal viruses. The scientific party line is that a monkey in Africa with AIDS bit a native on the butt. The native then went to town and gave it to a prostitute who gave it to the local banker who gave it to his wife and three girl friends and wham--75 million people became infected with AIDS in Africa. An entirely preposterous story.

Dr. Robert Gallo, "the co-discoverer of the AIDS virus," was interviewed by Newsweek for their "On Health" special issue (Fall, 1987).

In the Newsweek article Gallo continued to obfuscate by reiterating the disproven green monkey theory. Gallo knows perfectly well that AIDS was spread in Africa and around the world by the AIDS-contaminated smallpox vaccine of the World Health Organization. Being a member of their team and, at least indirectly, paid by them and the National Institute of Health (NIH), he is trying to pin the blame on the green monkey and 16th-century Portuguese traders.

Gallo continues to spread confusion and disinformation among scientists and the public. Through his influence, and the influence of others in the U.S. bureaucratic Establishment, AIDS research was thrown back at least a year. Gallo knows that AIDS and HTLV-I didn't exist in nature before about 1970. Gallo knows that these viruses are laboratory viruses.

Monkeys don't get it and humans, including Portuguese traders, don't get it until it has been manufactured in a lab and run through human tissue cells. Or in the case of monkeys, run though monkey tissue cells. If there were any virologists in Portugal engineering these viruses during the 16th century it is the best-kept secret in the annals of medical history.

Next Gallo appeared on 60 Minutes (the guy's everywhere). "All the scientific signposts point to Africa," the 60 Minutes commentator said in introducing Gallo on November 8, 1987.

"No one can prove where AIDS began," Dr. Gallo says, "[but] if monkeys in central Africa harbor retroviruses, and they do; and if some of them are like the human leukemia virus, and they are; and if some of them are like the human AIDS virus, and they are; and if monkeys when they are caught sometimes bite, and I think they do, then doesn't it make reasonable sense that is the best bet until someone comes up with a better idea?"

The answer is that anyone could come up with a better idea because:

• Many animals "harbor retroviruses," including rats, sheep, cattle and pigs, but none of them has ever appeared in man until recently.
• These viruses are all like the human leukemia virus except AIDS which is cytocidal and not leukemic, i.e., it kills the T-cells rather than causing a multiplication of these cells as in leukemia.
• Few of them are "like an AIDS virus" except for being in the retrovirus family.
• The fact that monkeys sometimes bite is irrelevant. Cats and pigs bite too, but they don't transmit AIDS. Only humans transmit AIDS to humans because cats, pigs and monkeys don't get AIDS. The human virus is not pathogenic in animals3 and the various monkey viruses are not associated with disease in wild animals except when laboratory-induced after capture.
• There has never been a proven case of a monkey transmitting a retrovirus to a human by bite or otherwise. Even monkeys artificially given AIDS by injection do not transmit the disease even to other monkeys.
• AIDS started in the cities of Africa where there are no wild monkeys, not in the villages.
• The doubling time of AIDS infection, being about 12 months, means that one monkey biting one native and then spreading the disease throughout Africa would have taken 20 years to reach a million cases. Seventy-five million Africans became infected practically simultaneously. At the same time the disease became rampant in the U.S., Haiti and Brazil. How could one monkey do that, even if he were an international flight attendant?

As Dr. Robert Strecker said on a KPFK~ Los radio show, "If you want to listen to the so-called experts for the truth in this disease we'll all be dead."

How many cats have feline acquired immune deficiency syndrome (FAIDS)? Many. How many cats have bitten humans? Many. How many humans have caught AIDS from cats? None.

Duesberg states categorically that, "The human (AIDS) virus is not pathogenic to animals" and the monkey viruses "are never associated with a disease in wild animals." Furthermore, animal AIDS, such as FAIDS and sheep visna, are not transmitted to humans.

I'm finally getting some help from the virology experts in exonerating the green monkey. "The popular theory that the AIDS virus jumped the biologic gap from the African green monkey to man drew nothing but scorn at an international conference on AIDS in Africa," reports Internal Medicine News, volume 20, No. 24.

Ironically, the conference was presented by the World Health Organization, the people who contaminated Africa with AIDS through smallpox vaccine. (No one mentioned that at the conference.)

Dr. Luc Montagnier, the real discoverer of the AIDS virus said, "There is no evidence of any reservoir species of monkeys that is truly positive for HIV (AIDS)."

A lot of misconceptions about AIDS were cleared up at this meeting but I doubt you'll hear about it on the evening news. The injecting of monkey blood for ritual purposes is probably a myth, long-time African experts reported. And contrary to popular belief, AIDS is not found in the rural areas where they hunt, eat and get bitten by monkeys but, almost exclusively in the cities where they have no exposure to monkeys.

Dr. Peter Piot, an African AIDS expert from Belgium said, "The biologic gap between the monkey virus and human host is too wide to be bridged in a single step even with direct injection of blood."

I emphasized "in a single step" in the quotation above because it takes many steps in a laboratory to engineer an animal virus to infect humans. AIDS is an animal virus, probably bovine visna virus, adapted for man. It was no accident.

Where does that leave Gallo's monkey business? His monkey would have to be taken from Africa, inoculated at the Fort Detrick, Maryland, laboratory (or similar sorcerer's workshop), and then taken back to Africa to bite a few million people--if monkeys transmitted AIDS to humans in the first place, which they don't.

Gallo next pops up in American Medical News, 12/4/87. He got a five-page spread with no less than six pictures of himself, mostly in color. The headline for the article is simple, half-inch bold type: "ROBERT C. GALLO, M.D." Talk about adulation.

The reporter at least had the courage to ask Gallo about his claim to have discovered Ihe AIDS virus when in fact the French at the Pasteur Institute had isolated it a year earlier. Somehow the photos of the virus taken by the French ended up in Gallo's article announcing his momentous discovery.

When found out, Gallo said it was simply a mistake of some sort, the whole thing was just "baked-over media hype" and he was perfectly willing to give the French half the credit. Some gall.

The one thing Gallo said in this interview that I'm sure I agree with was: "Who the hell knows exactly how this virus spread?" (I'm going to tell the green monkey he said that.)

Genetically AIDS (HIV-1) is not even close to monkey form of immuno-deficiency virus. The genetic structure of any living organism is arranged in what is called codons: triplicates of amino acid "base pairs." These base pairs, composed of the amino acids adenine, guanine, thiamine, cytosine, etc. are the basic structure and identification system of all life, similar you might say, to a print board of a computer.

If you study these various amino acid combinations in the codon, you can identify absolutely what that particular organism is. You can definitely say that it is a rat or a rabbit or it's from a cabbage or an oak tree. No two codons in any living thing are the same.

The codons of AIDS do not exist in monkeys or other primates. The message encoded in the base pairs of AIDS does not come from monkeys--it's impossible: not improbable--impossible.

Much of the codon from AIDS would exist in primates (monkeys, apes, etc.), if it came from primates. The AIDS codon exists only in bovine (cattle) leukemia virus, sheep visna virus, cauliflower mosaic virus, and a few others. The "language" or the "print-out" of the DNA, i.e. the base pairs, is entirely different from the language of the DNA in monkeys, apes, man, etc.

Consequently, we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the AIDS virus came from a combination of cattle and sheep and simply had to be a genetically engineered virus in a laboratory. Gallo knows this. Essex and Haseltine know this. How long will they be able to keep the lid on this cover-up of the crime of the millennium?

Japanese researchers punched more holes in the monkey bite theory of the origin of AlDS and confirmed that it doesn't make any scientific sense. They have studied the entire genetic code of the AIDS-like virus that infects African green monkeys and have concluded that it would be impossible for green monkeys to be the source of AlDS.

It is obvious that one monkey couldn't have caused AIDS (or one homosexual either). There had to be some sort of simultaneous seeding process. The only worldwide simultaneous seeding going on at the time was the smallpox vaccine program of the World Health Organization, the WHO. The early epidemiology of the AIDS pandemic fits the smallpox vaccination project of the WHO and nothing else (with the exception of the U.S. which we will explain subsequently).

The AIDS virus was created in a laboratory by combining lethal animal "retroviruses" in human cancer (HeLa) cell cultures and/or calf serum. These viruses have never before caused infections in man. The "species barrier" has always been nature's way of keeping a deadly virus from wiping out the entire animal kingdom, including man. The myxoma virus of rabbits, for example, wiped out the rabbit population of Europe, but man and other animals were not affected. The sheep visna virus completely decimated the flocks of Iceland, but no other animal was affected.

The virologists deny that the AIDS virus, HIV-1, is of animal origin. I am sure that you see the paradox here. Aren't monkeys animals?

They are also united in saying that it's not possible for the virus to have been engineered in a laboratory. If it didn't come from other animals and it didn't come from a laboratory and they now admit privately that the monkey couldn't have done it, then it must have come out of thin air. That's a theological position and hence beyond argument. It's certainly not scientific.

These scientists, creating deadly viruses in their sorcerer's retrovirology laboratories, are constantly caught in their own lies. The line goes: "The AIDS virus could not have been engineered in a laboratory because the technology wasn't available until recently." Icelandic scientists combined the sheep visna virus with human tissue cells over 20 years ago. The technology has been refined in recent years, but the basic process has been actively used in labs all over the world for long before the AIDS virus made its dramatic appearance.

But the scientists hold fast in their denial of culpability.

Professor WIlliam Jarrett said, when asked about the possibility of AIDS arising from animal retroviruses, "That is like someone saying babies come out of cabbages."

Dr. Robert Gallo said that people who claim AIDS was manufactured artificially are "either insane or communists."

Dr. J. Weiss: "Anyone who says AIDS came from a laboratory is either anti-science or a vivisectionist."

Dr. Luis Montagnier, the discoverer of the AIDS virus, said, "In 1970 there was not enough knowledge in genetic engineering to make such a virus starting from already existing viruses."

This tower of lies must eventually fall of its own weight. Then what? Where do we look for a solution? Certainly not from the people who caused the disaster. But where--the Pentagon? The Pentagon is supporting research on biological warfare in over 100 Federal and private laboratories including many prominent universities. Yet, Neil Levitt, who worked for 17 years at the Army's Infectious Disease Institute, says, "It's a joke. . .there's no defense against these kinds of organisms. And if you can't defend against something, then why are we pouring more and more money into it? There's something else going on that we don't know about."

Some joke.

Alert readers will say, we don't give smallpox vaccinations in the U.S., so how do you explain the simultaneous outbreak of AIDS in Africa, Brazil and Haiti, where they did indeed give the vaccine, with the U.S. where they didn't give the vaccine?

Simple. The homosexual community was used as a large group of experimental animals through the hepatitis-B program. It didn't take many infected homosexuals among the I.V. drug users to quickly spread the disease among a large percentage of the addicts due to the near certainty of infection through direct intravenous insertion of the virus.

To understand the seeding of AIDS among homosexuals, (and eventually to the rest of us through bisexuals unless drastic action is taken), you must know about a character with the strange name of Wolf Szmuness. His life story will seem bizarre to you unless, like me, you have a conspiratorial turn of mind.

Dr. Szmuness was a Polish jew who supposedly ended up in a Siberian labor camp during World War II. But after the war he somehow became a privileged person, was sent to medical school in Tomsk, Russia, and married a Russian woman, hardly typical treatment of an enemy of the Soviet state.

Szmuness' biographer said that Wolf was always reluctant to discuss "those dark years in Siberia." Maybe he was reluctant because he wasn't in Siberia. If he was he certainly wasn't shoveling salt.

In 1959 the Soviet government "allowed" him to practice in Poland in a public health capacity.

Standard policy in all Communist countries is never to allow all members of a family to travel out of the country to the West at the same time. This eliminates 98 percent of all defection attempts. I have physician friends in Hungary, for example. He can go to a meeting anywhere in the world if she stays home. She can go if he stays home. They can both go if the children are left at home.

But in 1969, the entire Szmuness family was allowed by communist Poland to go to a medical meeting in Italy. At that time they "defected" and moved to New York City.

With no American credentials whatsoever, he immediately got a job as a "lab technician" at the New York City Blood Center. Within a very few years this Polish immigrant was given his own lab, a separate department of epidemiology was created for him at the blood bank and he, like the chrysalis turning into a butterfly, changed into a full professor of epidemiology at the Columbia Medical School!

In six years this "lab tech" became a full professor and then went back to Moscow for a scientific presentation and was received as a dignitary, not a defector.

We tell you this amazing story because in retrospect it is obvious that Wolf Szmuness was a carefully groomed communist agent, planted here after years of preparation, to instigate biological warfare against the American people.

Szmuness, with the full cooperation and financial support of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and the National institutes of Health, masterminded the hepatitis-B vaccine experimental program used on homosexual men. He insisted that only young, promiscuous homosexuals be allowed to participate in the experiment. The experiment started in New York at the blood bank in November, 1978. The experimental vaccine was produced in a government supervised laboratory.

The study was completed in October, 1979. Within 10 years most of these young men would be dead or dying from AIDS.

In 1980 the program was expanded to major cities all across the U.S. In the fall of 1980 the first AIDS case was reported in San Francisco. Eight years later most of the homosexuals in San Francisco were infected, dead or dying.

Szmuness did not live to see the fruition of this larger experiment. He died of cancer in 1982.

Also from "Putting it all Together" by Terrance Jackson, an insert goes on to say:

Was HIV Genetlcally Englneered?

Even if HIV is not the only factor that causes AIDS, there exists a strong link between HIV and AIDS. Currently, there is evidence that shows that HIV may be the product of genetic engineerlng. In January 1986, the French-born and trained biologists, Professor Jakob and Dr. Lilli Segal, published a pamphlet, AIDS. USA-Home Made Evil; Not Imported from Africa, extensively reprinted in English-speaking Africa. The scientists, a biophysicist and a biologist affiliated with the Humboldt Unlversity of Berlin, pointed out that examination of the genes making up HIV reveals that the differences between it and other retroviruses ostensibly in the same family "could not have come about by a natural way known to the biologist." They called the virus "a chimera, created only a few years ago," and they suggest Fort Detrick, Maryland, the site of much U.S. government CBW research, as the probable blrthplace.

The Segals argue that HIV could not have evolved naturally from other members of the retrovirus family, but was rather assembled in a way which could only have occurred in a laboratory. They analyzed comparisons of HTLV-I with HTLV-III which indicated that the differences were "not of a magnitude to be explained by mutations. It was rather a matter of a complete restructuring, the disappearance of important structural parts and the emergence of new gene groups. A change from the HTLV-I to the HTLV-III could not have come about by a natural way known to the biologist."

Let me conclude this presentation by stating that I remember reading in the Atlanta Constitutional Journal sometime in 1996 that one out of every 100 white males are immuned from the HIV virus.